{"id":64285,"date":"2022-11-01T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-11-01T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.themainemag.com\/?p=64285"},"modified":"2022-11-04T08:46:10","modified_gmt":"2022-11-04T12:46:10","slug":"loren-coleman-and-the-radical-field-of-cryptozoology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.themainemag.com\/loren-coleman-and-the-radical-field-of-cryptozoology\/","title":{"rendered":"Loren Coleman and the Radical Field of Cryptozoology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"
Coleman with artist Jeff Irvin\u2019s life-size Yeti head, Frosty. The real stories of Yetis and Abominable Snowpeople are Coleman\u2019s first love in cryptozoology, and his connections to \nhis own Cherokee and Scottish roots make him aware of how everyone\u2019s ancestry is linked to their cryptid legacies.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Meet Loren Coleman, executive director of the world\u2019s only International Cryptozoology Museum, which he founded in Portland in 2003. He is known as the world\u2019s most popular living cryptozoologist\u2014cryptozoology being the study of hidden, unknown species that are yet to be verified in the field of zoology. Coleman has done over 60 years of boots-on-the-ground field-work tracking Bigfoot, and he also has 40 books under his belt, plus a memoir in the works. As of late, Coleman has been pursuing a new adventure: this time in Bangor, it\u2019s an even bigger museum and bookstore that will also be a home for his archive of over 100,000 books on natural history, UFOlogy, parapsychology, and cryptozoology. I talked to Coleman about a lifetime of tracking\u2014and sometimes finding\u2014the invisible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How do you think people see you, and how do you want to be seen?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most people don\u2019t know I\u2019m male. They hear the name \u201cLoren\u201d and they think I\u2019m \u201cLauren.\u201d I\u2019m talked about online as \u201cshe,\u201d as \u201cher.\u201d I have a not-real-deep voice. I present myself the way I am, which is calm, soft-spoken, and with a whole history of pacifism as a conscientious objector. I have a degree in psychiatric social work, was senior researcher at the Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Service from 1983 to 1996, and I\u2019m a baseball dad. That\u2019s the most important to me\u2014a lot of my decisions have been based on where my kids are and how much time they need with me. Cryptozoology is the passion that eventually grew into my job, so to speak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do you believe in Bigfoot?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I believe in nothing, and I\u2019m open-minded to everything. The evidence that I see: the tracks, the hair samples, the animals that are preyed upon\u2014those are all the physical evidence. I don\u2019t get into the paranormal, and I\u2019m more into my philosophical, internal clock or network of taking information in. I don\u2019t investigate a Bigfoot report and believe that report. Instead, I accept or deny the evidence. I really am very cautious of the two different ends of the continuum; both can be very confusing to the excluded middle that I occupy. There are people who accept everything: they hear a noise in the woods, and they think it\u2019s a flying demon or a dragon or a Thunderbird or a Bigfoot. And on the other end, there are the debunkers, the skeptics with a big S. If someone comes along and says, \u201cthat\u2019s foolishness,\u201d or \u201cthose replicas that you have at the museum are toys,\u201d it doesn\u2019t bother me. I know why I have them: it\u2019s to represent what they might look like and ask witnesses, \u201cIs that near to what you saw?\u201d I use them as measuring sticks for people to compare their experience with. I really don\u2019t put a lot of energy into arguing with people, and I\u2019m absolutely not evangelical about cryptozoology. Rather, my brain needs to be stimulated and filled with passion, with different stories, with different experiences. I don\u2019t smoke. I don\u2019t take drugs. I have cryptozoology. It\u2019s everything I need.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I was called a radical within a radical field, and that makes me comfortable. That makes me happy.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Cryptozoology in Maine involves frequent sightings of \u201cmystery cats\u201d and, less so, Bigfoot. Coleman with a replica of an authentic elongated skull from Peru; cone-shaped skulls found in the Paracas region of Peru by Peruvian archeologist Julio Tello have become tied to claims that they belong to aliens, and their association with Illuminati signaling (covering one eye) has propelled them into modern conspiracy theory.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
Coleman in his library of 100,000-plus books at the Bangor archives; here he is consulting his mentor Ivan T. Sanderson\u2019s book “Abominable Snowmen: Legend Come to Life.”<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tell me how you were once a kid who grew up to be a professional Bigfoot hunter.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I read all the time when I was young, more than anybody else in my family. In the late 1950s, I was reading a lot of Roy Chapman Andrews. He was an explorer with the American Museum of Natural History. He went to the Gobi Desert, discovered dinosaur fossils. There was Raymond Ditmars, a herpetologist who wrote books on snakes. And of course, there was Jane Goodall. I was interested in the subject of natural history, but also the individuals who were exploring very much interested me. In March of 1960 in Decatur, Illinois, I watched a film that very much captured my imagination. It was a Japanese science fiction horror film called Half Human, or Beastman Snowman. The director was Ishir\u014d Honda, who also did Godzilla and Rodan, and I found out he had been a documentary filmmaker for years before he got into science fiction films. I went to school the next week after seeing this movie twice and asked my teachers, \u201cWhat is<\/em> this?\u201d And of course, there were no books on the Abominable Snowman. There were no, you know, cryptids. My teachers told me these creatures don\u2019t exist, to go back to my homework, and to leave them alone. And so that of course instilled in me a desire to find out everything I could.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s talk about that famous video clip of Bigfoot. What\u2019s your take on that clip?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

October 20th, 1967. That\u2019s when the film was taken. And now, with NASA-quality computer enhancement, you can see features in the film. There\u2019s a lot about the film that people missed in the first decade or two. Now, you can see there\u2019s muscle movement in the back of the legs. The muscles contract. A lot of people, when they first saw that film of Bigfoot, they would say, \u201cHe did this,\u201d or \u201cHe went that way, and he crouched over.\u201d With more developed technology, it didn\u2019t take too long for people looking more closely to see that this is a female. She has breasts. They move. So the most revealing of all of the hoaxes with Bigfoot is that it had been male. That\u2019s something that I\u2019ve documented. Bigfooters used to be male, and now it\u2019s gender diverse, but most of the men that wrote those books could not bring themselves to talk about a female Bigfoot. They talk about males only. But I was trying to document the genders and the sexual evidence in the field, and it got me into all kinds of trouble. I shook them up. I was called gay for doing it. I was called a radical within a radical field, and that makes me comfortable. That makes me happy.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t

\n \t\t\n
\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t \n\t\t\t \t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\t\t\t